Institutional Pre of Stem/steam Learning In Paredness for the Integration in Punjab

Institutional Pre of Stem/steam Learning In Paredness for the Integration in Punjab

Onika Puri, Dr. Kiran Duggal

Vol 8 , Issue 1 , July 2023 | Pages: 45-52 | Research Paper

Download Article

Author Details

1. Onika Puri, Research Scholar G.H.G Harparkash College of Education for Women, Ludhiana, Punjab
2. Dr.Kiran Duggal, Associate Professor G.H.G Harparkash College of Education for Women, Ludhiana, Punjab

STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) approach is becoming more and more popular on a global basis as it focuses a strong emphasis on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, Technology. Finding out how prepared Punjab educational institutions are to integrate STEM and STEAM education into their respective curricula is the main objective of the study that will be discussed in this article. As several educational institutions spread out over Punjab’s province, questionnaires and interviews were conducted in order to collect data for the study. The majority of the inquiries concerned the ease of use of various resources, the level of education attained by the teachers, and the state of the infrastructure. The research’s findings showthat while interest in STEM and STEAM education is growing in Punjab, there is still insufficient funding,inadequate teacher preparation, and insufficient infrastructure to support it. This is true despite the fact thatinterest in the topic is rising. Despite the fact that interest in the subject is growing, this is the current state ofaffairs. In order to increase institutional readiness for the integration of STEM and STEAM education, thegovernment of Punjab and educational institutions should invest in resources, teacher preparation programs,and infrastructure, in accordance with the study report’s recommendations. To improve institutional readiness for the integration of STEM and STEAM education, certain expenditures should be made. In Punjab, there is agrowing interest in STEM/STEAM education, but the results indicate that there are not enough materials,teachers, or infrastructure to support its implementation. If Punjab’s educational institutions act in this way,they will be better able to give their students the skills they need for the future and better prepare them for thechallenges they will confront in the twenty-first century..

Keywords

Arts integration, STEM education, STEAM integration, science education.
  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2013). Teaching with and about nature of science, and science teacher knowledge domains. Science & Education, 22(9), 2087–2107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9520-2 Aftska, O., & Heaton, T. J. (2019).
  2. Mitigating the efect of language in the assessment of science: A study of English-language learners in primary c l a s s r o o m s i n t h e U n i t e d K i n g d o m . S c i e n c e E d u c a t i o n , 1 0 3 ( 6 ) , 1 3 9 6 – 1 4 2 2 . https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21545 Agostini, E., & Francesconi, D. (2021).
  3. Introduction to the special issue “embodied cognition and education.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 20(3), 417–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09714-x American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1994).
  4. Benchmarks for science literacy. Oxford University Press. Andrzejczak, N., Trainin, G., & Poldberg, M. (2005). From Image to Text: Using Images in the Writing Process. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 6(12)
  5. 1–17. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/101199/. Arends, R. I. (2015).
  6. Learning to teach (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill. Babaci-Wilhite, Z. (2019). Educational tools to teach STEAM subjects integrating linguistic rights, collaboration, and critical thinking.
  7. In: Promoting language and STEAM as human rights in education. Springer. https://doi. org/10.1007/978- 981-13-2880-0_1 Bang, M., Warren, B., Rosebery, A. S., & Medin, D. (2012).
  8. Desettling expectations in science education. Human Development, 55(5–6), 302–318. https:// doi.org/10.1159/000345322 Begolli, K. N., & Richland, L. E. (2016).
  9. Teaching mathematics by comparison: Analog visibility as a double-edged sword. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(2), 194. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000056 Betancur, L., Votruba-Drzal, E., & Schunn
  10. C. (2018). Socioeconomic gaps in science achievement. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0132-5 Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (2020).
  11. In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms (2nd ed.). Pearson College 16Div. Brooks, N., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2016).
  12. Moving to learn: How guiding the hands can set the stage for learning. Cognitive Science, 40(7), 1831–1849. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12292 Brouillette, L., Childress-Evans, K., Hinga, B., & Farkas, G. (2014).
  13. Increasing engagement and oral language skills of ELLs through the arts in the primary grades. Journal for Learning through the Arts. https://doi.org/10. 21977/D910119300 Bube, A. (2021).
  14. Educational potentials of embodied art refection. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 20(3), 423–441. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11097-020-09685-z. Bybee, R. W. (2014).
  15. NGSS and the next generation of science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10972-014-9381-4 Bybee, R., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Carlson Powell, J., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2015).
  16. The BSCS 5E instructional model. NSTA press. Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006).
  17. The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and efectiveness. BSCS, 5, 88–98. Campbell, C., Speldewinde, C., Howitt, C., & MacDonald, A. (2018).
  18. STEM practice in the early years. Creative Education, 9(01), 11. https://doi.org/ 10.4236/ce.2018.91002 Catterall, J. S. (2009).
  19. Corrigan, M. W., Grove, D., Andersen, S., Wong, J. T., & Hughes, B. S. (2022). Sometimes fnding nothing is something: Shrinking the gap between emerging bilingual learners and English fuent students (Case in point). International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(1), 11–27.
  20. https:// doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.1.11 Craig, P., Cooper, C., Gunnell, D., Haw, S., Lawson, K., Macintyre, S,, Ogilvie, D., Petticrew, M., Reeves, B., Sutton, M., & Thompson, S. (2012) Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: New Medical Research Council guidance. Journal of Epidemiology Community Health, 66(12):1182–1186. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2011-200375.
  21. Crowder, M. J., & Hand, D. J. (2017). Analysis of repeated measures. Routledge. Daugherty, M. K. (2013). The Prospect of an “A” in STEM Education. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 14(2), 10-15.
  22. https://bit.ly/ 3IojpnU. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience (p. 362). Minton, Balch & Co. Donovan, L., & Pascale, L. (2012). Integrating the arts across the content areas. Teacher Created Materials. Dufy, T.M., & Raymer, P.L. (2010).
  23. A Practical Guide and a Constructivist Rationale for Inquiry Based Learning. Educational Technology archive, 50, 3–15. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44429836 Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Falco, M., & Hansen, W. B. (2003).
  24. A review of research on fdelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Education Research, 18(2), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/18.2.237 Efand, A. D. (2004). Art education as imaginative cognition 1. In E. W. Eisner & M. D. Day (Eds.), Handbook of research and policy in art education (p. 757). UK: Routledge. Eisner, E. W. (2002).
  25. The arts and the creation of mind. Yale University Press. Estrella, G., Au, J., Jaeggi, S. M., & Collins, P. (2018). Is inquiry science instruction efective for English language learners? A meta-analytic review. AERA Open.
  26. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418767402 Flores, N. (2020). From academic language to language architecture: Challenging raciolinguistic ideologies in research and practice. Theory into Practice, 59(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1665411 García, O., & Wei, L. (2014).
  27. Translanguaging and education. In O. García & L. Wei (Eds.), Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education (pp. 63–77).

Puri & Duggal(2023, July). Institutional Pre of Stem/steam Learning In Paredness for the Integration in Punjab. IPEM JOURNAL OF INNOVATION IN TEACHER EDUCATION8(1),45–52.