Promoting the Role of Educators in Providing Teaching-Learning Strategies for Students with Learning Disabilities in the Modern Inclusive Classroom Settings

Author Details

The present study promotes the role of educators in providing teaching-learning strategies for students with learning disabilities (SwLD) in modern, inclusive classroom settings. The term LD covers a broad range of issues when individuals describe problems with understanding, absorbing, remembering, and using both verbal and nonverbal knowledge. Some diseases cause people to have below-average intelligence, making it hard to pick up new skills. LD covers various conditions, from very minor to very severe. Young people who struggle academically may have unique accommodation demands. Perception is a challenge for SwLD, who often struggle with perception. A loss of sensation in any one sense is conceivable. Hereditary and neurological factors account for the majority of LD cases. Defects in reading, language, processing, and mathematics are the most common forms of LD. Perception is a challenge for teaching-learning strategies. How to adapt to SwID is an ongoing endeavour because of the difficulties of perception, which is a problem for educators. Our claim to expertise in LD is unfounded. The majority of SwLDs need help with understanding words and expressions. In teaching and learning, perceptions can be a hurdle for students with SwLD in today’s inclusive classrooms. Some national governments have passed laws and launched initiatives to increase diversity and inclusion in the classroom in response to the challenge’s teachers face when responding to student perspectives. When SwLD is serious about inclusion, they need the same chances to participate in class as any other student. Schools must implement measures to ensure that all student groups receive adequate support for inclusive education to be effectively carried out. A wide range of teaching-learning strategies can help students who struggle to learn. The employment of strategies for teaching-learning is one way to promote inclusive education. The study’s main goal is to contribute to our understanding of how educators might enhance their continuing education to assist SwLD in modern inclusive classroom settings.

Keywords

Promotion, Role, Educators, Providing, Teaching-Learning Strategies, Students with Learning Disabilities, Modern, and Inclusive Classroom Settings

1. Abrol, M. Role of Teacher in Promoting Inclusive Education. IJFMR-International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 5(2).
2. Adelman, H. S., & Taylor, L. (2002). School counselors and school reform: New directions. Professional School Counseling, 5(4), 235.
3. Ainscow, M., & César, M. (2006). Inclusive education ten years after Salamanca: Setting the agenda. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 231-238.
4. Avramidis, E. (2006). Promoting inclusive education: from ―expertism‖ to sustainable inclusive practices. Changing teaching and learning in the primary school, 103-114.
5. Bonvin, D., Bastiaansen, J. A., Stuber, M., Hofmann, H., &Ebersold, M. M. (2017). Folic acid on iron oxide nanoparticles: platform with high potential for simultaneous targeting, MRI detection and hyperthermia treatment of lymph node metastases of prostate cancer. Dalton Transactions, 46(37), 12692-12704.
6. Diamond, F., Parr, G., &Bulfin, S. (2017). University–school partnerships in English pre-service teacher education: A dialogic inquiry into a co-teaching initiative. Changing English, 24(3), 266-284.
7. DiPaola, M. F., & Walther-Thomas, C. (2003). Principals and Special Education: The Critical Role of School Leaders.
8. Friend, M. (2008). Co-teaching: A simple solution that isn’t simple after all. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 2(2), 9-19.
9. Friend, M., Cook, L., Hurley-Chamberlain, D., &Shamberger, C. (2010). Co-teaching: An illustration of the complexity of collaboration in special education. Journal of educational and psychological consultation, 20(1), 9-27.
10. Ekeh, P. U. (2012). Children‟ s Attachment Styles, Academic Achievement and Social Competence at Early Childhood. African Research Review, 6(4), 335-348.
11. Jachova, Z., DimitrovaRadojichikj, D., &ChichevskaJovanova, N. (2004). Early intervention of children with disabilities. Journal of Special Education and Rehabilitation.
12. Kapranov, P., Cawley, S. E., Drenkow, J., Bekiranov, S., Strausberg, R. L., Fodor, S. P., &Gingeras, T. R. (2002). Large-scale transcriptional activity in chromosomes 21 and 22. Science, 296(5569), 916-919.
13. La Salle, T. P., Roach, A. T., & McGrath, D. (2013). The Relationship of IEP Quality to Curricular Access and Academic Achievement for Students with Disabilities. International journal of special education, 28(1), 135-144.
14. Lamport, M. A., Graves, L., & Ward, A. (2012). Special needs students in inclusive classrooms: The impact of social interaction on educational outcomes for learners with emotional and behavioral disabilities. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 1(5), 54-69.
15. Mogbo, I. N. (2002). Restructuring the curriculum of the disabled for self-sustenance, counseling implications. The Journal of National Council for Exceptional Children, 6(4), 76-80.
16. Newman, L., Wagner, M., Cameto, R., &Knokey, A. M. (2009). The Post-High School Outcomes of Youth With Disabilities up to 4 Years After High School: A Report From the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). NCSER 2009-3017. National Center for Special Education Research.
17. National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (2007). Learning Disabilities and Young Children: Identification and Intervention. A Report from the National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilitie, October, 2006 (pp. 63-72). Learning Disability Quarterly, 63-72.
18. Oladayo, O. T., &Oladayo, C. E. (2012). Effects of direct and indirect instructional strategies on students‟ achievement in Mathematics. African research review, 6(4), 349-361.
19. Ozoji, B. E., &Mankilik, M. (2015). Assessment of Conceptual Demands of Basic Science Curriculum and Students‘ Cognitive Development in Plateau State, Nigeria.
20. Ragan, C. R. (2001). The development and implementation of a co-curricular transcript program at Rowan University.
21. Raymond, E. B. (2014). Learners with mild disabilities. Pearson.
22. Shevchenko, Y. M., Dubiaha, S. M., Melash, V. D., Fefilova, T. V., &Saenko, Y. O. (2020). The Role of Teachers in the Organization of Inclusive Education of Primary School Pupils. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(7), 207-216.
23. Slee, R. (2018). Defining the scope of inclusive education.
24. Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., … & Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learningprofile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2-3), 119-145.
25. Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms.Ascd.
26. Walker, S., & Katz, C. M. (2012). The police in America. McGraw-Hill.
27. Yell, M. L., Shriner, J. G., &Katsiyannis, A. (2006). Individuals with disabilities education improvement act of 2004 and IDEA regulations of 2006: Implications for educators, administrators, and teacher trainers. Focus on exceptional children, 39(1), 1-24.
28. Yell, M., Katsiyannis, A., Ennis, R. P., &Losinski, M. (2013). Avoiding procedural errors in individualized education program development. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(1), 56-64.

Thomas, Baiju(2024). Promoting The Role of Educators in Providing Teaching-Learning Strategies for Students with Learning Disabilities in The Modern Inclusive Classroom Settings. IPEM JOURNAL OF INNOVATION IN TEACHER EDUCATION, 9(1), 19–26.