The Impact of Technology Integration in Curriculum on Students’ Cognitive Engagement

IPEM Journal Education > The Impact of Technology Integration in Curriculum on Students’ Cognitive Engagement

The Impact of Technology Integration in Curriculum on Students’ Cognitive Engagement

Ms Parul Tyagi

Vol 8 , Issue 1 , July 2024 | Pages: 49-54

DOI: 10.61691/IPEM_CTE.23.2024.49-54

Published Online: July, 2024

Download Article

Author Details

1. Ms Parul Tyagi, Assistant Professor, Centre for Teacher Education, Institute of Professional Excellence and Management, Ghaziabad, U.P., India

This research paper examines the influence of technology integration on the effectiveness of curriculum delivery and its impact on students’ cognitive engagement. By analyzing existing literature and conducting surveys this study aims to provide insights into the potential benefits and challenges of incorporating technologies into the educational landscape. The research also explores the role of teachers, students, and institutional support in successful technology adoption. The findings shed light on the complex relationship between technology integration and students’ cognitive engagement, offering valuable recommendations for future curriculum and pedagogy reforms. Questionnaires have been shared with teachers to gather data on their experiences and perceptions of technology integration in the curriculum. A Likertscale-basedquestionnaire was used to measure the cognitive engagement of participants.

Keywords

Technology integration, curriculum, cognitive engagement

  1. Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning, and contemporary culture. Polity.
  2. Carle, A. C., Jaffee, D. E., & Miller, R. M. (2009). Performance outcomes of a lecture recording system in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(9), 1096-1103.
  3. Christensen, C. M. (2008). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. McGraw-Hill.
  4. Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. Teachers College Press.
  5. Lewis, M. W., & Smith, D. A. (1993). In: Teaching thinking: An agenda for the twenty-first century. APA Educational Psychology.
  6. Mistler-Jackson, M., &Songer, N. B. (2000). Student motivation and internet technology: Are students empowered to learn science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 459-479.
  7. Mo, Y. (2011). Gender differences in educational outcomes: Evidence on the role of the policy environment. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19(9), 1-24.
  8. Schindler, L. A., Burkhardt, C. A., Morad, O. A., Marsh, M. L., Wills, B., & Wright, J. (2017). Student engagement in elementary school classrooms using technology. Computers in the Schools, 34(1-2), 3-24.
  9. Sun, C., Dickinson, G., Bhatti, A., & Vas, C. (2016). Barriers to the adoption of online learning systems in U.S. K-12 schools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(1), 37-58.
  10. Valentine, J. W. (2012). The impact of curriculum design on student achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(1), 1-32.
  11. Wellings, J. S., & Levine, H. G. (2009). New opportunity for students and schools: Online learning and virtual schools in the United States. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 17(1), 1-59.
  12. Woolf, B. P., Shute, V. J., VanLehn, K., Burleson, W., King, S., Suthers, D., & Tonkin, J. (2010). Proceedings of the National Research Council Workshop on Technology-Enhanced Assessment. National Academies Press.

Tyagi, Parul(2024). The Impact of Technology Integration in Curriculum On Students’ cognitive Engagement. IPEM JOURNAL OF INNOVATION IN TEACHER EDUCATION, 9(1), 49-54.