Security Aspects in Cloud Transitioning

IPEM Journal Computer Applications > Security Aspects in Cloud Transitioning

Security Aspects in Cloud Transitioning

Mr. Vinay Singh, Mr. Amarjeet

Vol 9 , Issue 1 , December 2024 | Pages: 50-53

Published Online: December, 2024

Download Article

Author Details

1. Mr. Vinay Singh, Engineer, 6032 Blue Ridge Dr, Apt#A, Highlands Ranch, Colorado, 80130, USA
2. Mr. Amarjeet, Engineer, 710 Duncan Ave Apt#1409 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15237, USA,

Microservices architecture has emerged as a preferred development model for enterprise applications due to its ability to address the inherent complexity, scalability demands, and low-latency requirements of such systems. This architecture enables enterprises to build API-driven, loosely coupled, highly scalable, and adaptable platform solutions, particularly in containerized cloud environments. Despite its growing popularity, there is a noticeable lack of comprehensive research in this domain, particularly regarding early defect identification.

Keywords

Version Control System, Git, Subversion, micro-service, Kubernetes, container.

  1. Hou Q., Ma Y., Chen J., and Xu Y., “An Empirical Study on Inter-Commit Times in SVN,” Int. Conf. on Software Eng. and Knowledge Eng.,” pp. 132–137, 2014.
  2. Arafat, and D. Riehle, “The Commit Size Distribution of Open Source Software,” Proc. the 42nd Hawaii Int’l Conf. Syst. Sci. (HICSS’09), USA, pp. 1-8, 2009.
  3. Kolassa, D. Riehle, and M. Salim, “A Model of the Commit Size Distribution of Open Source,” Proc. the 39th Int’l Conf. Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Comput. Sci. (SOFSEM’13), Czech Republic, pp. 52–66, 2013.
  4. Ha ori and M. Lanza, “On the nature of commits,” Proc. the 4th Int’l ERCIM Wksp. Softw. Evol. and Evolvability (EVOL’08), Italy, pp. 63–71, 2008.
  5. Hofmann, and D. Riehle, “Estimating Commit Sizes Efficiently,” Proc. the 5th IFIP WG 2.13 Int’l Conf. Open Source Systems (OSS’09), Sweden, pp. 105–115, 2009.
  6. Kolassa C., Riehle, D., and Salim M., “A Model of the Commit Size Distribution of Open Source,” Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Computer Science (SOFSEM’13), Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Baden-Wür emberg, p. 5266, Jan. 26-31, 2013.
  7. Arafat O., and Riehle D., “The Commit Size Distribution of Open Source Software,” Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science (HICSS’09),” IEEE Computer Society Press, New York, NY, pp. 1-8, Jan. 5-8, 2009.
  8. Purushothaman, and D.E. Perry, “Toward Understanding the Rhetoric of Small Source Code Changes,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 511–526, 2005.
  9. Alali, H. Kagdi, and J. Maletic, “What’s a Typical Commit? A Characterization of Open Source Software Repositories,” Proc. the 16th IEEE Int’l Conf. Program Comprehension (ICPC’08), Netherlands, pp. 182-191, 2008.
  10. Hindle, D. Germán, and R. Holt, “What do large commits tell us?: a taxonomical study of large commits,” Proc. the 5th Int’l Working Conf. Mining Softw. Repos. (MSR’08), Germany, pp. 99-108, 2008.
  11. Alok Aggarwal, Vinay Singh, Narendra Kumar, “A Rapid Transition from Subversion to Git: Time, Space, Branching, Merging, Offline Commits & Offline builds and Repository Aspects,” Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications, vol. 14: e210621194190, 2021.
  12. Singh, M. Alshehri, A. Aggarwal, O. Alfarraj, P. Sharma et al., “A holistic, proactive and novel approach for pre, during and post migration validation from subversion to git,” Computers, Materials & Continua, vol. 66, no.3, pp. 2359–2371, 20

V. Singh and Amarjeet, “Security Aspects in Cloud Transitioning,” IPEM Journal of Computer Application & Research, vol. 9, pp. 50–53, Dec. 2024. DOI: