A Sociological Study of Workplace Discrimination and Exploitation Faced by Domestic Women Workers in Mathura City
A Sociological Study of Workplace Discrimination and Exploitation Faced by Domestic Women Workers in Mathura City
Vol 20 , Issue 1 , July 2026 | Pages: 115-121
DOI: 10.61691/IPEM_Mgmt.20.2026.115-121
Published Online: July, 2026
- Author Affiliations
- Abstract
- References
- Citation
Author Details
Prof. Birpal Singh Thenua
Associate Professor, Department of Sociology and Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, Dayal bagh Educational Institute, Agra
Email ID: drthenuan@yahoo.comMs. Anjali
Research Scholar, Department of Sociology and Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, Dayal bagh Educational Institute, Agra
Email ID: anjali.deiphd@gmail.com
This paper presents a sociological examination of the workplace discrimination and exploitation experienced by domestic women workers in Mathura City. Mathura, though widely known as a pilgrimage centre, is also a rapidly urbanising town in which women from diverse social backgrounds are increasingly engaged as domestic helpers within private households. Domestic work in India operates largely outside the framework of formal labour regulation, leaving workers without written contracts, fixed wages, or social security, and rendering the employer household a largely unmonitored workplace. Against this backdrop, the study explores the socio-economic profile of domestic women workers and the forms of discrimination and exploitation they encounter in relation to caste, income, and migration status, while situating their experiences within the gendered devaluation of domestic labour.
The research adopts a descriptive design combining a structured questionnaire with semi-structured interviews. Data were obtained from 80 domestic women workers across selected urban and peri-urban localities of Mathura, and were analysed using descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages) alongside thematic analysis of the interview narratives. The findings indicate that domestic work in the city is dominated by women from marginalised caste groups and low-income households, that migrant workers are particularly exposed to wage exploitation and job insecurity, and that the absence of formal protections sustains long hours, irregular pay, and limited dignity at work. The study underlines the need for legal recognition, regulated wages, welfare provisions, and employer sensitisation to advance decent work for this essential but neglected segment of the informal workforce.
Keywords: domestic women workers; workplace discrimination; informal labour; caste; migration; decent work; Mathura; social inequality.
Chadha, P. (2021). Challenges of domestic women workers in India: Rights, wages, and social protection. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Drishti IAS. (2025). Living and working conditions of domestic workers in urban India. New Delhi: Drishti IAS Reports.
Globalization & Health. (2024). Health risks and occupational hazards of domestic workers: A global perspective. Globalization & Health, 20(1), 1–12.
Gupta, R. (2024). Domestic labour and gendered exploitation: Sociological insights. Indian Journal of Social Work, 85(2), 150–169.
International Labour Organization. (2011). Domestic Workers Convention (C189) and Recommendation (R201). Geneva: ILO.
International Labour Organization. (2019). Decent work for domestic workers in India: Challenges and policy options. Geneva: ILO.
ILO India. (2019). Domestic workers in India: Policy brief on wages, rights, and social protection. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
NDWM. (2016). National Domestic Workers’ Movement: Report on the status of domestic helpers in India. New Delhi: NDWM Publications.
Parpiani, S. (2021). Power relations and exploitation in domestic work: A sociological study. Journal of Labour Studies, 15(3), 45–62.
SPRF. (2021). Informal labour and wage inequality among domestic workers in India. Social Policy Research Foundation Reports, 7(1), 23–40.
Thakkar, A. (2024). Feminist perspectives on domestic labour in urban India. Gender & Society, 38(1), 78–95.

